The 1st 50 years of American women¡¯s suffrage was ¡°votes without leverage,¡± based on a book with the same name by Anna Harvey, a political scientist at New York University. But women¡¯s leverage on politics is now stronger than ever, and it appears to be growing with every successive election cycle.
At least 13 ladies, a record, will win a major party nomination for the US Senate this year, assuming three female incumbents ¨C Lisa Murkowski (R) of Alaska, Kirsten Gillibrand (D) of New York, and Barbara Mikulski (D) of Maryland ¨C overcome token primary opposition over the next month.
Within the unelected side of things, you will find three female justices within the Supreme Court, considering that Elena Kagan was sworn in. Speaker Nancy Pelosi is the earliest woman to lead the House of Representatives. And America¡¯s secretary of State has been a woman for 10 from the past 14 many years, with Madeleine Albright, Condoleezza Rice, and Hillary Rodham Clinton all serving as the country¡¯s chief diplomat.
The changes reflect the adjustments inside the electorate. Far more ladies than males have voted in each presidential election given that 1960. Four times considering 1976, far more than 60 percent of females have voted in a presidential election; adult males have topped the 60 percent turnout mark only once in that span, based on data from Rutgers University¡¯s Center for American Adult females and Politics.
On the other hand, despite progress, a gap does remain between women¡¯s participation in mass politics and women¡¯s participation in the higher levels of the political game, says Jennifer Lawless, a political scientist at American University.
¡°Women turn out to vote in greater proportions than men, so females can often be the decisive bloc in an election,¡± Ms. Lawless says. ¡°Still, we don¡¯t see girls running for office nearly as much as males do.¡±
Still, in their collective effect on mass politics, women¡¯s political influence is high. Groups of females are increasingly seen as the key to electoral victory for the two parties.
In the 1990s, the decisive bloc was ¡°soccer moms,¡± the growing class of suburban mothers whose primary concerns were education as well as the economy. After the 9/11 attacks, ¡°security moms¡± concerned about terrorism were courted by both events and credited for fueling George W. Bush¡¯s victory in 2004, in which he got a higher percentage of women¡¯s votes than any Republican presidential candidate given that his father.
Lawless says that both events, and particularly Democrats, now recognize that they will need vigorous support from adult females to win elections. This evident inside the way they present their platforms to the public. ¡°Women¡¯s issues¡± are not the focus, but the way females see the problems is.
¡°Both events these days actually try to frame problems in [women¡¯s] terms,¡± Lawless says. ¡°Security is framed as, 'How to keep the kids safe?' The economy is framed as, ¡®How do I put food around the table?¡¯ ¡®How do I pay for college?¡¯ ¡±
没有评论:
发表评论